POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Topics: United States, Unlawful combatant, Guantanamo Bay detention camp Pages: 16 (6132 words) Published: October 22, 2014
POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
http://homeworkmonster.com/downloads/pol-201-week-4-dq-2-habeas-corpus-war-terror/ POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012). An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as “enemy combatants.” A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
http://homeworkmonster.com/downloads/pol-201-week-4-dq-2-habeas-corpus-war-terror/ POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012). An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as “enemy combatants.” A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
http://homeworkmonster.com/downloads/pol-201-week-4-dq-2-habeas-corpus-war-terror/ POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012). An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as “enemy combatants.” A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror Essay
  • POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
  • Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror Essay
  • POL 201 Week 5 DQ 2 Voting and Turnout Essay
  • Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror Essay
  • Habeas Corpus and the on War on Terror Essay
  • Habeas Corpus And War On Terror Essay
  • Habeas Corpus and War on Terror Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free