Research Critique in Midwifery

Topics: Research, Quantitative research, Scientific method Pages: 10 (3457 words) Published: June 20, 2011
A constructive critique of the research into women’s experiences of becoming a mother after prolonged labour. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) state in their code of conduct state that nursing and midwifery care must be evidence or best practise based. Therefore it is essential that students are able to analyse and critique research papers in order to determine the validity of the study and to apply theories to practise. This essay intends to critique and analyse the research paper, in order to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the research undertaken. Certain questions are required to ensure that the evaluation is assessing the essential components of the research (Holloway& Wheeler, 2002). Therefore Holloway and Wheeler’s (2002) critique framework for qualitative research will be used to critique and evaluate the study. This essay also intends to acknowledge the research limitations and the implications for practise. It also intends to evaluate if the methodology and processes are applicable to the research type. The research paper is a qualitative study concerning women’s experiences following the phenomenon of prolonged labour and an instrumental or caesarean delivery (Nystedt et al., 2008).They were selected from two Swedish hospitals and chosen by the principle researcher after examination of the partograms in their labour documentation. The candidates had given birth between November 2003 and April 2000. The research title is the first point of contact of the research, and should demonstrate the content of the study (Hicks, 1996). A research title should indicate both the group being studied, and the characteristic being reported, which is key in a qualitative study (Polgar & Thomas, 2000). In this study, the title states prolonged labour and women’s experiences of becoming a mother (Nystedt et al., 2008). It does not mention the type of delivery which is also a criteria of the research. In assessing whether the topic and title are relevant to the type of research, Holloway and Wheeler (2002), state that in qualitative research the participants create the data for analysis, and this data is placed as the highest priority. There are also to be no concepts, frameworks and ideas prior to commencing the study, which is relevant to quantitative research (Rees, 1997). The topic and the study are both appropriate and relevant to qualitative research. The views of the participants created the data for analysis, and the research has placed this data as the highest priority. In this study the researcher did not apply theoretical concepts prior to analysing the data, therefore is applicable and relevant to qualitative research. The title of the study is also an indication of phenomenological research. Phenomenologists study the lived experience or the phenomenon to be the topic that is researched (Cluett & Bluff, 2000). The abstract of an article is a comprehensive overview of the article contents and should be precise as many practitioners’ only source the abstract when accessing research (Cluett & Bluff, 2000). If the study differs from the title then it should be reflected in the abstract (Cluett & Bluff, 2000). The abstract in this study defined that the research was based on women who had encountered an instrumental or caesarean birth (Nystedt et al., 2008).This therefore resolves the shortfall in the title. The abstract should also provide a clear overview of the methodology used and the findings, as it may be indicative of a study shortfall if not included (Hicks, 1996). In this abstract the sample size of ten and the interview method were clearly stated and reflected the information shown in the study main aim. The findings are dissolved into shorter sentences and reflected in the conclusion. Therefore the abstract in this instance is a reflection of the research. Reviewing literature surrounding the research topic is an important function in the research process as it enables the...

References: Abbott, P. & Sapsford, R. (1999). Research methods for nurses and the caring professions. (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Algovik, M. Nilsson, E. Cnattingus, S. Lichtenstein, P. Nordenskjold, A. & Westgren, M. (2004). Genetic Influence on dystocia. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologia Scandinavica. 83 (9), 832-837.
Cluett, E. & Bluff, R. (2000). Principles and practise of research in midwifery. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall.
Creedy, D. Shochet, I. & Horsfall, J. (2001). Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors. Birth. 27(2), 104- 111.
Department of Health (1998) Midwifery: Delivering our future. London: Department of Health.
Fawcett, J. Pollio, N. & Tully, A. (2007). Women’s perceptions of caesarean and vaginal delivery: another look. Research in Nursing and Health. 15 (6), 439- 446.
Government Offices of Sweden. (1997). Research infrastructure. Retrieved July 04, 2009, from http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/6949/a/88148.
Hicks, C
Holloway, I. & Wheeler, S. (2002). Qualitative research in nursing. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications Ltd.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Caesarean section. London; NICE.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008). The Code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives. London: NMC.
Nysted, A. Hogberg, U.& Lundman, B. (2005). The negative birth experience of prolonged labour: a case referent study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 14(5), 579-586
Nysted, A
Polit, D. & Tatano Beck, C. (2006). Essentials of nursing research methods appraisal and utilization. (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Rees, C
Rowe- Murray, H. Fisher, J. (2001).Operative intervention in delivery is associated with compromised early mother- infant interaction. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 108(10), 1068-1075.
Stadmayr, W. Schneider, H. Amster, F. Burgin, D. & Bitzer, J. (2004). How do obstetric variables influence the dimensions of the birth experience as assessed by Salmons item list. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 115(1), 43-50.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • A Critique of the Qualitative Research Essay
  • research critique Essay
  • Research Critique 2 Essay
  • Essay on Research Critique
  • Research Critique Essay
  • Research Critique Essay
  • Essay about Research Critique Part 1
  • Research Critique part 2 Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free