Submited by: Athihe Krichena
M.A English (p) 2nd Semester
I.A Response sheet
26th March, 2012.
“TERRORIST’S ATTACKS: 26/11 AND 9/11”. The widespread use of the very term 26/11 set the Mumbai terrorist attack apart in the public consciousness with its clear reference to the 9/11 terminology of the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington. It is a terminology with which Indian has a love-hate relationship. On the one hand, it suggests that India’s misfortune can only evoke international sympathy and status if they are in some way positioned as satellites of America’s darkest hour of the new century. On the other hand, it has helped imprint in our minds a shorthand reference for the outrage, anger and despair both attacks evoked. Both were similar in their ability to shake people to their core.
Many Indians while sympathising with the United States after 9/11, pointed out the 6,000 feared dead in the WTC wasn’t a big number compared with 50,000 killed over a decade in Kashmir. The US was getting a small dose of Islamic terrorism that had long devastated Kashmir. The US never equated Kashmiri terrorism with war and always told India to be calm and not bomb terrorist training camps in Pakistan. But when the US itself got a taste of this at home, it went ballistic, declared it was at war with terrorism and vowed to attack and kill all the perpetrators. Many have also resented that the terrorist groups out of Pakistan with the blessing of the ISI are basically funded by the United States aid to Pakistan, though not directly and says that the 26/11 attack was another tragic outcome to the US government’s reaction.
9/11 in part remains so resonant in the US, precisely because of its uniqueness- unique because there had not been a similar incident before or has not been one since. Before 9/11 the US suffered terrorist attacks on embassies and other installations abroad. But 9/11 was the first terrorist attack on US...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document